Solar shade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:: that if global warming became a problem, we could cool down the planet by if this lens were built and global warming were avoided, there would be less http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_shadeHOME | We know what Al Gore thinks. We know what Hollywood thinks. And we know what some mereorologists think. Can we get a word on the global warming debate from a scientists or two? How about, say 400 scientists? Yep, thats not a typo- its FOUR HUNDRED scientists! Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called consensus on man-made global warming. Objections you say?
The new report issued by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee’s office of the GOP Ranking Member details the views of the scientists, the overwhelming majority of whom spoke out in 2007. Ah, so the report came out of the politicians closet- and a GOP one of course!
Who can believe a Republican politician? But, wait!
This blockbuster Senate report lists the scientists by name, country of residence, and academic/institutional affiliation. It also features their own words, biographies, and weblinks to their peer reviewed studies and Cool farms mask the extent of global warming - earth - 14 August 2007 :: air, irrigated fields tend to cool things down, they say - and there is evidence US, these cool farms have counteracted global warming, say Céline Bonfils http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn12482-cool-fnt-of-global-warming.htmlHOME | original source materials as gathered from public statements, various news outlets, and websites in 2007. This new “consensus busters” report is poised to redefine the debate.
Many of the scientists featured in this report consistently stated that numerous colleagues shared their views, but they will not speak out publicly for fear of retribution. Atmospheric scientist Dr. Nathan Paldor, Professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, author of almost 70 peer-reviewed studies, explains how many of his fellow scientists have been intimidated.
“Many of my colleagues with whom I spoke share these views and report on their inability to publish their skepticism in the scientific or public media,” Paldor wrote. Does this mean we scrp the Greenhouse effect ideas?
Specifically, these scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore. Why not. Hes become the lightning rod, the poster child for global warming.
One other top-notch scientists added to the 400 pile on.
Paleoclimatologist Dr. Tim Patterson, professor in the department of Earth Sciences at Carleton University in Ottawa, recently converted from a believer in man-made climate change to a skeptic. Patterson noted that the notion of a “consensus” of scientists aligned with the UN IPCC or former Vice President Al Gore is false. “I was at the Geological Society of America meeting in Philadelphia in the fall and I would say that people with my opinion were probably in the majority.”
So much for the Kyoto Agreement- or disagreement too!
Let the debate heat up!
Pre-Article:Banks Making Huge Profits From Payment Protection Next-Article:What are Phone Phreakers?
|